Academics have a duty to defend open knowledge systems like Wikipedia(blogs.lse.ac.uk)
227 points by jruohonen 5 days ago | 150 comments
tl;dr: Generative AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini are siphoning readers from Wikipedia while simultaneously scraping its content for training, threatening the volunteer community that sustains it. The author argues academics have an ethical duty to defend Wikipedia by contributing expertise, citing it in scholarly work, and teaching students to edit it—noting that Wiki Education programs already supply roughly 19% of new active editors. For this to work, universities must formally recognize Wikipedia contributions as legitimate public service in tenure and evaluation processes.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑Supports citing Wikipedia and broadening academic evaluation to recognize open knowledge contributions
  • ~Notes irony that academia previously rejected Wikipedia and now is asked to defend it
  • ↓Wikipedia is compromised by ideological bias and not worth defending
  • ↓Real fight should be against Elsevier/publisher monopolies, not saving flawed Wikipedia
  • ↓Converting consumers into contributors is empirically very difficult, undermining the article's practical plan