Why is every rationalist blog post way too long?(alexwennerberg.com)
413 points by epestr 1 day ago | 443 comments
tl;dr: Rationalist bloggers like Scott Alexander and Eliezer Yudkowsky produce extraordinarily long posts that mistake verbosity for thoroughness, piling on detail and nuance rather than interrogating their initial assumptions or broadening their intellectual sources. The author argues this style lacks wisdom—the discretion to know what's worth pursuing and saying—and reflects a community bias against common sense and tradition, where sheer volume of writing on heterodox ideas is treated as evidence of their merit.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑Rationalists' self-perception as uniquely smart leads them to overvalue their own output
  • ↑Rationalists lack grounding in traditional philosophy and formal argumentation, resulting in bloated essays
  • ↑Verbosity masks imprecision and poor writing quality in rationalist material
  • ↓The article misrepresents the data, cherry-picking examples while actual post lengths are reasonable
  • ~Length is a natural consequence of genuinely considering nuance and multiple perspectives