California is chasing wealth that has feet(blog.landeconomics.org)
281 points by idbnstra 19 days ago | 816 comments
tl;dr: California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax will fail because billionaires are mobile—several major targets have already relocated, forcing rates higher and driving more out. The Center for Land Economics argues a 0.25% land value tax would raise the same $20B annually on a base 8x larger ($8.14 trillion) that can't flee the state, while also fixing revenue distortions caused by Prop 13's frozen property assessments. Land value taxes hit concentrated wealthy holdings hardest, can't be passed to renters, and capture public-created value like transit-driven appreciation.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑Georgist land value tax is philosophically justified and incentivizes efficient land use
  • ↓Questions the article's claim that land taxes can't be passed to renters
  • ↑Wealth taxes are futile because billionaires can evade them, supporting article's premise
  • ~Prop 13 reform (especially for non-primary residences) is the real overlooked solution
  • ↓California already has enough revenue and doesn't need new taxes at all