I don't want to read what you didn't write(blog.colinbreck.com)
994 points by mooreds 22 days ago | 424 comments
tl;dr: AI-generated writing (design docs, PR summaries, blog posts, personal messages) is unreadable because readers lack the context the prompter had, and it strips out the voice, vulnerability, and narrative that make writing worth engaging with. The author found AI genuinely useful as a writing *assistant*—for fact-checking against source code, fixing grammar, generating citations, and drafting abstracts—but never for producing prose from scratch. The takeaway: use AI to sharpen your own writing, not replace it, because readers increasingly disengage from (and distrust) authors who ship LLM output as their own thinking.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑AI-generated writing wastes readers' time and shifts unfair review burden onto them
  • ↓LLMs can legitimately help less articulate people express and structure their thoughts
  • ~AI is acceptable if heavily edited to remove AI voice and genuinely convey meaning
  • ↑Raw human stream-of-thought is preferable to AI-processed prose, and AI writing quality is declining
  • ↑AI acts as a hallucination layer that damages authentic human communication and may subtly shape opinion