AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible(john.hartnup.uk)
1860 points by ereiamjh 24 days ago | 942 comments
tl;dr: AI-generated event posters look identical because people accept ChatGPT's default "craft fair" aesthetic; asking it to pick a deliberately different style, or naming a specific one (Bauhaus, Risograph, Memphis, Japanese minimal, punk fanzine, etc.), produces far more distinctive results. The author demonstrates this with a series of examples and notes ChatGPT will happily suggest style options if you ask. Tools like Claude and Gemini can also output editable HTML/PDF rather than flat images.
HN Discussion:
  • ↑AI output beats budget freelance designers even if imperfect
  • ↓AI stays surface-level and stereotypical, lacking true creative depth
  • ↓Even the article's better examples still look uniformly AI and unremarkable
  • ↑Default AI aesthetic signals low effort, insulting to viewers
  • ↑Critics conflate spotting bad AI use with having actual design taste