I like 'em thick: an apology to my English teachers(experimental-history.com)
849 points by Ariarule 3 days ago | 336 comments
tl;dr: Great art has "thickness"—it rewards sustained attention by revealing more layers (discarded approaches, deliberate choices, recurring motifs, real costs paid by the creator), unlike "slop" that evaporates under scrutiny. The author argues English teachers failed to explain that literature is like a cave requiring effort to explore, and warns that AI-generated content and the poptimist erosion of quality distinctions leave us defenseless against thin, mass-produced work. The hard part of making something—the thickening—is the only part worth doing, and it can't be automated.
HN Discussion:
  • Personal anecdotes reinforcing how great art captivates and rewards deep engagement
  • Extends the article's argument by adding that great art also communicates deep truth
  • The differential 'why this not that' analytical approach is powerful for generating depth
  • ~Disagrees with dismissing rhyming poetry; rhyming itself demonstrates the effort the author values
  • ~School timing is wrong for art appreciation because students lack historical context