Devtools must be open source(blog.exe.dev)
634 points by bryanmikaelian 22 hours ago | 210 comments
tl;dr: AI agents have dramatically lowered the cost of personalizing software—you can now prompt an agent to modify source code and automatically rebase your changes against upstream releases, making bespoke tooling practical for individuals and small teams. This shifts the value away from plugin systems and configuration APIs toward direct source modification, which means devtools must be open source to remain competitive. Closed-source tools like Claude Code hit a wall here, while open agents like Codex or Pi can be personalized freely.
HN Discussion:
  • LLMs make the original open source dream of modifying your own tools actually feasible for regular users
  • Source modification via LLMs is wasteful compared to proper config systems and plugin architectures
  • Demanding source code from developers reflects entitlement rather than legitimate need
  • Nightly AI-driven rebases are unreliable and will silently break workflows
  • ~Maintaining personal forks is real work most engineers don't want, and open source hurts devtool business viability