Couple pay >$800k for a gene-editing therapy for their daughter. She died.(science.org)
350 points by Shortness8 1 day ago | 226 comments
tl;dr: Summary not available
HN Discussion:
  • Scientific critique of AAV vector choice for brain gene therapy given known immune risks
  • Ethical outrage at doctors downplaying risks and ignoring warning signs from animal studies
  • Treatment was inappropriate for a non-lethal condition when better candidates exist
  • Cultural context in China around developmental delays shaped the family's decision
  • Negative research outcomes must be published as prominently as successes to advance the field