| How we measured AI writing across arXiv, and where the measurement breaks(unslop.run) | |
| 233 points by dopamine_daddy 23 hours ago | 159 comments | |
tl;dr: Researchers scored 12,750 arXiv papers with a detector calibrated so pre-ChatGPT papers flag at 0.4%, and found the machine-written share rose from that floor to ~32% recently, peaking near 39% in early 2026. Computer science leads at 65%, while math sits near 0.7%—though the authors caution that math's sparse prose may be out-of-distribution for the detector. Reported figures are a lower bound: detector coverage is imperfect, and flags capture "machine-like writing" (including heavy AI editing), not authorship. | |
HN Discussion:
| |