Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners

	Evidence of inconsistencies in evaluation process and selection of winners(kaggle.com)
	461 points by twerkmeister 23 hours ago \| 289 comments
	tl;dr: Summary not available
	HN Discussion: ↑AI-generated submissions and AI-based judging have corrupted hackathons and competitions ↓Organizer defends the process, explaining extended judging timeline and effort ~Kaggle was never a rigorous source, so these problems aren't surprising ~Brute-force and black-box winning approaches have always existed in Kaggle ↑Mocking the dismissive 'just accept the results' attitude toward inconsistencies