Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown(english.elpais.com)
421 points by geox 19 hours ago | 559 comments
tl;dr: Brown University economics professor Roberto Serrano caught at least 50 students cheating on a take-home midterm using ChatGPT, after the class averaged 96/100 but dropped to 48/100 on an in-person final—with 22 of 27 no-shows having previously scored perfect 100s. Serrano criticized Brown's administration for responding with silence and is abandoning take-home exams, while urging broader debate on AI-enabled academic fraud. The incident reflects a wider trend: Princeton recently ended its 133-year-old unproctored honor code system in response to AI cheating.
HN Discussion:
  • In-person, handwritten exams are now necessary; AI era may strengthen degree signaling value
  • Universities must redesign courses adversarially with paper exams and 1-on-1 interviews to combat AI cheating
  • Honest students are forced to cheat to stay competitive when peers use AI on curved grading
  • The professor is being a luddite; he should just switch to in-person exams instead of complaining
  • ~Take-home closed-book exams are inherently flawed; AI isn't the real problem here