Why does kinetic energy increase quadratically, not linearly, with speed? (2011)(physics.stackexchange.com)
257 points by ProxyTracer 13 hours ago | 123 comments
tl;dr: Two intuitive arguments derive KE ∝ v² without invoking work or mgh. The first uses a spring pushing two equal-mass boxes apart, combined with conservation of momentum and Galilean invariance of potential energy, to show that doubling velocity quadruples kinetic energy. The second uses a constant gravitational field and energy conservation: comparing dropping an object in four stages versus one, and launching in reverse, forces KE(v) = 4·KE(v/2).
HN Discussion:
  • ~Potential-to-kinetic energy conversion provides the most intuitive explanation for quadratic scaling
  • Derives KE=½mv² directly from work=force×distance and F=ma definitions
  • Symmetry/invariance arguments (Galilean, rotational) elegantly explain quadratic dependence
  • Counterfactual analysis shows linear KE would break Galilean relativity and physics
  • Quadratic form is only an approximation; relativistic kinetic energy is a higher-order series