PR spam today looks like email spam in the early 2000s(greptile.com)
235 points by dakshgupta 22 hours ago | 135 comments
tl;dr: After OpenClaw went viral, weekly PRs jumped from 2 to 3,400 while merge rates collapsed from 48% to 9.3%, with much of the influx being AI-generated slop (one user submitted 106 PRs in a day). The author argues this mirrors early-2000s email spam and will require sender-reputation systems like Mitchell Hashimoto's Vouch, and notes that AI homogenizes contributions—multiple users independently submitted identical PRs. Refactors that require deep codebase understanding merge at 35% vs. 9% for features, suggesting human judgment still beats agent-generated novelty.
HN Discussion:
  • Maintainers increasingly ignore or auto-close legitimate contributions, frustrating genuine OSS contributors.
  • Sender-reputation analogy is flawed because email reputation is org-based, not individual-based.
  • Practical mitigations like GitHub PR limits or requiring non-textual contributor meetings can help.
  • The article is ironic/self-serving since OpenClaw itself is the AI tool generating the slop being complained about.
  • Reputation infrastructure and unsubscribe-style blocklists would be valuable additions for PRs.